The dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico is shrinking because of warming water and not because of less nitrate flowing in from the Mississippi River complex, according to two leading researchers.
Dr. Nancy Rabalais and Dr. Gene Turner, a wife-husband team at Louisiana State University, forecast last Thursday that the hypoxia zone will shrink considerably because of “much warmer” water at the depths off the coastline. They pegged the dead zone at 1,972 square miles at the end of July. That’s less than half the size forecast by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, which estimated the size at 5,800 square miles.
Their model was not included in the NOAA estimate, so they released it separately. This is the first time that water temperature’s influence was factored in to a dead zone model. NOAA officials said they are considering how the LSU model may impact the government forecast.
If accurate, the size of the dead zone forecast by Rabalais and Turner would be on track with goals set by the Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Task Force chaired by Iowa Secretary of Agriculture Mike Naig. Its goal is for the dead zone to be 1,900 square miles or smaller by 2035.
Rabalais and Turner stressed that the shrinkage is due entirely to water that has warmed rapidly in recent years. They note that nitrate loads to the river have not decreased. Fertilizer application tripled from 1950 to 2015. It is believed that the dead zone did not exist before 1970. Meanwhile, water temperature off the continental shelf increased about 5 degrees Fahrenheit. That rise affects the entire deep ecosystem from plankton to shrimp.
It speaks to their integrity as scientists that they want to get their forecast model out there even if it superficially erodes their argument about lessening nitrate loads to the Gulf. Rabalais talks about the nitrogen cycle and the “nitrodollar” supply chain. She told me that voluntary nutrient reduction plans have not cut nitrate loads to the rivers or Gulf, and that flows with what Iowa scientists like Dr. Chris Jones and others observe. (Jones believes the dead zone will grow with this year’s massive discharge.)
If the dead zone comes in under 2,000 square miles the agribusiness lobby will declare victory over surface water pollution. When drought dried up tile lines and reduced nitrate flow to the river from drainage tile, the agribusiness establishment cheered the Iowa voluntary program. When the tile lines started running this year, the Raccoon swelled with nitrate again.
We still have a nutrient problem. The dead zone at best is the size of Rhode Island this year. Iowa has an unexplained cancer explosion. Des Moines is chasing its tail for drinking water. Still, about 30% of our nitrogen application is lost to air and water, and we are putting manure on top for good measure. Nitrate and phosphorous do all sorts of nasty things in the water. In the Gulf, they do not act in isolation with just each other.
Rabalais said they do not know how warming water at depth will impact fisheries and production. Complicated interactions are going on whereby microbial life peaks and then drops off over a certain temperature. As water warms, the Gulf swells and storms, threatening wetlands and shallows that protect the coast.
She will watch results trickle in from a scientific ship cruise at the end of the month measuring oxygen deprivation off the Gulf coastline. Members of the hypoxia task force will be watching closely, too, no doubt hoping that the LSU model and forecast prove right.
It’s a fascinating twist in a storyline that has run for decades, highlighted by the Des Moines Waterworks 2015 lawsuit against Buena Vista, Sac and Calhoun counties over nitrate pollution of the Raccoon River by ag drainage systems. The lawsuit was dismissed, and the Upper Midwest has stuck to voluntary incentives to heal the Gulf. A confirmed reduction in the size of the dead zone will be cause for celebration in the offices of West Des Moines and the capitol. It won’t mean much at the waterworks, which is running its nitrate removal system again.
Art Cullen is the editor of the Storm Lake Times Pilot in Northwest Iowa, where this column appeared. For more columns and editorials, please consider a subscription to the Times Pilot. Or, if you wish, you can make a tax-deductible gift to the Western Iowa Journalism Foundation to support independent community journalism in rural Iowa. Thanks.
The Iowa Writers’ Collaborative
Have you explored the variety of writers, plus Letters from Iowans, in the Iowa Writers’ Collaborative? They are from around the state and contribute commentary and feature stories of interest to those who care about Iowa. Please pick five you’d like to support by becoming paid. It helps keep them going. Enjoy:
Thanks, Art, for the information contained in the article. I see this as a huge piece of ripe propaganda ready to spread across the intellectual fields of the uninformed. Looking at the recent Iowa Poll, we are losing the battle to win hearts and minds. Uphill we march. Thank you for helping lead us.
It is interesting to me as one who was involved in Iowa Farming until 1968 that as animals were removed from small farms and placed in confined lots, the use of nitrate fertilizer increased. Scooping out the Dairy Barn and swine feeding floor were every. Morning Chores
The fields received the benefits of the manure and the Bank Account received the benefits of not having to to go to the supply store for soil amendments.
The Animal Confinement was localized at a place that didn’t necessarily produce the feed for the Animals. The manure was a problem because the old Farmal could pull the spreader though one gate or another and discharge its load on a field or pasture. To have to go to town to get the manure from a Confinement Center required a road worthy and road legal vehicle. Also, Confined Animals required various medicines to protect them from the maladies of Confinement. Not necessarily what Ol’McDonald wants on his field.
So, he goes to the bank to get funds to buy fertilizer. The Bank became a partner in the endeavor and required the protection of Crop Insurance . Making is simple just made it more complicated. Not to mention poisoning the ground water and adding organic material back into the soil. I find myself like so many Iowans, we finally inherit the Farm when in our seventies. I don’t like what the tenants have been doing to Granpa’s Farm but looks like they are getting another year. First thing the Attorney told me, “Under Iowa Law, one can only change tenants in September